New Delhi: The Supreme Court docket of India on Thursday launched an official assertion rejecting claims of being the “supply of data” for sure media reviews about complaints in opposition to justices and a doable motion to be taken by Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde. ALSO READ | ‘Fought Exterior For Far Too Lengthy’: Robert Vadra Expresses Ambitions To Take Political Plunge Quickly
Within the launch, the apex courtroom mentioned that it by no means leaks info (to public or press) relating to “confidential” and “in-house procedures”.
The official assertion by Supreme Court docket comes after current media reviews which quoted ‘Supreme Court docket sources’ for possible actions taken by the CJI on criticism of Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy in opposition to some judges of the upper judiciary.
“Media has lately been reporting about complaints making insinuations in opposition to members of the upper judiciary, and the motion more likely to be taken by the Chief Justice of India,” the discharge said.
The assertion additionally referred to the usage of apex courtroom because the supply to lend credibility to such information reviews and mentioned the ‘in-house procedures’ to cope with complaints in opposition to judges of upper judiciary was wholly “confidential in nature” and it by no means releases such an info.
“Supreme Court docket is being quoted because the supply of the data. It’s clarified as soon as and for all that inquiries below the ‘In-house Process’ being completely and wholly confidential in nature, Supreme Court docket by no means releases info in issues incidental thereto,” the assertion mentioned.
The assertion by prime courtroom got here quickly after Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jaganmohan Reddy had written to CJI Bobde alleging that Justice Ramana was utilizing his clout at AP Excessive Court docket to favour the opposition Telugu Desam Get together.
Reddy had accused Justice Ramana of swaying judicial appointments within the State courts, which may have grow to be vital in altering choices in favour of TDP leaders who’ve corruption circumstances in opposition to them in varied courts.