Ashish Kaul, creator of the e book “Didda: The Warrior Queen Of Kashmir”, who has filed an FIR towards actress Kangana Ranaut for saying the movie “Manikarnika Returns: The Legend Of Didda” with out his approval, says the narrative of the queen being a nationalist who nurtured an undivided India has been written solely by him.
Kaul filed his First Info Report at Khar station for the violation of copyright Act. His software has been positioned below Part 156(3) of CrPC, 197. The case has been filed towards Kangana, her sister Rangoli Chandel, Kamal Kumar Jain and Manikarnika Movies Personal Restricted on Friday.
Speaking completely to IANS, Kaul stated: “Copyright Act protects exclusivity. This can be a non-bailable offence, which quantities to 3 years of jail time period as current Excessive Court docket order. Moreover my e book, there is just one e book on this planet that mentions Didda. That 3,000-page e book, ‘Rajataringi’, solely has two pages on Didda the place they speak about her sexual life, and the way she killed her son and toddler grandsons. The narrative of her being a nationalist who nurtured the undivided India has been written by solely me. “
On how his work reached Kangana, the creator stated: “I used to be in talks with varied manufacturing homes for my e book to be made into a movie, which I may direct. The potential financer and distributor Mr. Uttam Maheshwari, who had come on board, despatched my docket to Kangana. It had my script, characterisation, potential forged — the whole lot.”
“For the final three years, all I’ve executed is dream about this movie and labored in direction of it. Now I’m in main loss as a result of I used to be already in talks with manufacturing homes,” Kaul added.
He revealed that he had despatched a mail to Kangana informing her of the copyright violation however was met with a holding response that they might reply to his mail.
When contacted, Kangana Ranaut’s advocate Rizwan Siddiquee stated: “I shall acquire a replica of all the proceedings from the courtroom after which give an in depth assertion. At this juncture I can not remark with out perusing the grievance intimately.”
Kaul’s FIR was filed for infringement of the copyright and varied different sections together with 420, which quantities to legal breach of belief, dishonest, dishonest with information that wrongful loss could guarantee to the particular person whose curiosity the offender is sure to guard, in addition to dishonest and dishonestly inducing supply of property, punishable below Sections 406, 415, 418, 34, 120 B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, learn with Part 51, 63, 63A and different provision of The Copyright Act, 1957 and Part 65 of the Info Know-how Act, 2000.
Watch this area for extra updates.